What changes?
State, process, occurrence?
Temporal analysis begins with events or states located in an order.
Side 93
A study of temporal order, duration and passage across physics, metaphysics and lived experience. Time seems both measurable as structure and felt as flow, yet those two descriptions do not map neatly onto one another.
Even before asking whether time “flows,” temporal structure allows events to be ordered and intervals to be compared.
State, process, occurrence?
Temporal analysis begins with events or states located in an order.
Before / simultaneous / after.
Temporal ordering need not imply a moving present.
Duration.
Clocks operationalize duration through regular physical processes.
Persistence through variation.
Change presupposes some relation between states at different times.
Present, remembered, anticipated?
Human temporal experience adds perspective to objective ordering.
Relativity makes simultaneity observer-dependent and links measured duration to motion and gravity.
Time is measured by comparing processes against regular physical standards.
Observers in relative motion need not agree on which separated events are simultaneous.
Moving clocks and clocks in different gravitational conditions can accumulate different proper times.
Space and time are geometrically linked rather than independent backgrounds.
Each worldline has its own accumulated duration.
Special spacetime structures can support a practical common time parameter without restoring universal Newtonian time.
Metaphysical theories of time disagree about existence, passage and the privileged status of the present.
| Theory | Core claim | Main pressure point |
|---|---|---|
| Presentism | Only present entities exist | Relativity and truth about the past |
| Eternalism | Past, present and future events all exist | Explaining experienced passage |
| Growing block | Past and present exist; future does not yet | Why this edge is objectively present |
| Moving spotlight | All times exist but one is objectively present | What moves and in what meta-time? |
| Relationism | Time depends on relations among events/change | Whether empty time is possible |
Subjective duration depends on attention, memory, arousal, novelty and the structure of ongoing activity.
Experience contains enough temporal width to perceive melody and motion.
Attention to time can lengthen prospective duration judgments.
Periods rich in distinct events may feel longer when remembered.
When attention is captured by a task, less monitoring is devoted to time itself.
Threat, anticipation and excitement can distort perceived duration.
Temporal cognition depends on retaining what is gone and simulating what has not yet happened.
Past events are re-presented from the standpoint of the current self.
Future simulation recruits many of the same resources used in episodic memory.
Agency depends on representing consequences that do not yet exist.
Temporal distance influences valuation and choice.
Concern for a future self assumes some persistence relation across time.
Temporal cognition also explores unrealized alternatives to actual history.
The arrow of time concerns why entropy, records, causation and memory all exhibit strong temporal asymmetry.
Entropy tends to increase toward what we call the future.
Causes ordinarily precede effects in our descriptions and interventions.
We retain records of the past, not the future.
Waves typically propagate outward from localized sources rather than converging spontaneously.
Temporal asymmetry may depend partly on low-entropy boundary conditions of the universe.