Maintain and manipulate information now.
Short-lived active representations support reasoning, comprehension and planning.
Side 84
A study of how past experience changes present cognition. Memory is not a single store but a family of systems that encode, stabilize, retrieve and reconstruct information over different timescales.
Different forms of memory preserve different kinds of information and support different behaviors.
Short-lived active representations support reasoning, comprehension and planning.
Episodic memory supports recollection of personally experienced scenes.
Knowledge can remain even when the original learning episode is forgotten.
Practice changes performance without requiring explicit verbal recollection.
Priming and conditioning demonstrate memory effects outside deliberate remembering.
Future intentions require maintaining or retrieving a planned action at the right moment.
Exposure alone does not guarantee durable memory.
Unattended input is weakly encoded.
Attention determines which details receive deeper processing.
Meaning + prior knowledge.
Linking new information to existing structure creates more retrieval routes.
Chunk, hierarchy, schema?
Organization reduces arbitrary detail and makes relationships memorable.
Recall, explain, solve?
Generation often strengthens encoding more than passive rereading.
Place, state, task?
Encoding context can later become part of retrieval.
Stabilization and reorganization continue over minutes, days and longer periods.
Activity-dependent plasticity can stabilize newly learned relationships.
Some memories become less dependent on the structures required during initial learning.
Sleep can support stabilization and integration of newly learned material.
Consolidation can extract regularities across multiple episodes.
Remembering may reopen stored information to updating before restabilization.
Failure to retrieve does not necessarily mean a memory trace has vanished.
| Retrieval process | Question | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Recall | Can the information be produced? | Requires strong internal retrieval cues |
| Recognition | Can the information be identified? | External options provide cues |
| Recollection | Can contextual details be recovered? | Supports event-like remembering |
| Familiarity | Does it feel known? | Can occur without contextual recall |
| Retrieval practice | Does recalling strengthen later recall? | Testing can improve long-term retention |
A memory can become inaccessible because it was weakly encoded, poorly cued, interfered with or transformed.
Some traces weaken without sufficient reinforcement or use.
Old learning can obstruct new learning and new learning can disrupt old recall.
Changing context can alter whether stored information is accessible.
Selection during retrieval changes later accessibility.
Repeated retelling and schema can reshape remembered detail.
Discarding obsolete or irrelevant detail can reduce interference and improve current performance.
Current knowledge, expectation and suggestion can influence what is recalled as past experience.
Some information from the original event remains available.
General knowledge fills gaps and supplies expected structure.
The mind must infer where a remembered detail came from.
Later information can become incorporated into recollection.
Subjective certainty can diverge from objective accuracy.